Can We Be Free in a World Full of Rules?
We live surrounded by invisible structures: workplace protocols, social expectations, legal frameworks, and cultural norms that shape our daily choices. Yet within these systems, we witness moments of quiet rebellion: the person who refuses to answer work emails after hours, the citizen who practices civil disobedience, the artist who breaks aesthetic conventions. This session examines the tension between the rules that organize society and our deep human need for autonomy.
Freedom often feels like an abstract concept until we bump against its limits. Sometimes resistance is dramatic and public; other times it's as simple as saying "no" to what everyone expects. We'll explore how power operates through seemingly neutral structures, how individuals navigate the space between conformity and rebellion, and what happens when the cost of compliance becomes too high.
Our conversation will explore:
Is true freedom possible within structured systems, or are we only choosing between different forms of constraint?
What forms can resistance take, and who gets to decide what counts as legitimate rebellion?
When does following the rules become its own kind of trap that diminishes our humanity?
This session challenges us to examine our own relationship to authority, compliance, and the ways we either submit to or resist the forces that shape our lives.
Can We Be Free in a World Full of Rules?
We live surrounded by invisible structures: workplace protocols, social expectations, legal frameworks, and cultural norms that shape our daily choices. Yet within these systems, we witness moments of quiet rebellion: the person who refuses to answer work emails after hours, the citizen who practices civil disobedience, the artist who breaks aesthetic conventions. This session examines the tension between the rules that organize society and our deep human need for autonomy.
Freedom often feels like an abstract concept until we bump against its limits. Sometimes resistance is dramatic and public; other times it's as simple as saying "no" to what everyone expects. We'll explore how power operates through seemingly neutral structures, how individuals navigate the space between conformity and rebellion, and what happens when the cost of compliance becomes too high.
Our conversation will explore:
Is true freedom possible within structured systems, or are we only choosing between different forms of constraint?
What forms can resistance take, and who gets to decide what counts as legitimate rebellion?
When does following the rules become its own kind of trap that diminishes our humanity?
This session challenges us to examine our own relationship to authority, compliance, and the ways we either submit to or resist the forces that shape our lives.
We live surrounded by invisible structures: workplace protocols, social expectations, legal frameworks, and cultural norms that shape our daily choices. Yet within these systems, we witness moments of quiet rebellion: the person who refuses to answer work emails after hours, the citizen who practices civil disobedience, the artist who breaks aesthetic conventions. This session examines the tension between the rules that organize society and our deep human need for autonomy.
Freedom often feels like an abstract concept until we bump against its limits. Sometimes resistance is dramatic and public; other times it's as simple as saying "no" to what everyone expects. We'll explore how power operates through seemingly neutral structures, how individuals navigate the space between conformity and rebellion, and what happens when the cost of compliance becomes too high.
Our conversation will explore:
Is true freedom possible within structured systems, or are we only choosing between different forms of constraint?
What forms can resistance take, and who gets to decide what counts as legitimate rebellion?
When does following the rules become its own kind of trap that diminishes our humanity?
This session challenges us to examine our own relationship to authority, compliance, and the ways we either submit to or resist the forces that shape our lives.
Conversation Catalysts
At Premise, a Conversation Catalyst is a short story, essay, film, or poem that sparks reflection and connection. It’s the shared reference point that grounds each session and opens the door to meaningful and deep conversation.
Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street by Herman Melville
Preparation: < 1.5 hours
%20copy_edited.png)
Rules surround us, from the written policies that govern workplaces to the unspoken norms that guide everyday behavior. They provide order and predictability, but they can also feel restrictive, leaving us to wonder how much freedom we really have within structured systems. Is freedom about escaping rules altogether, or about finding ways to live authentically within them? This session considers what it means to resist, comply, or quietly withdraw when faced with the forces that shape our lives.
Herman Melville, “Bartleby, the Scrivener”
Melville’s story introduces us to Bartleby, a law copyist whose quiet refusal—“I would prefer not to”—gradually unsettles the routines of his office and the expectations of his employer. Bartleby’s passive resistance exposes the limits of workplace structures and the discomfort that arises when someone withdraws from compliance.
_edited.png)
Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street by Herman Melville
Preparation: < 1.5 hours
Rules surround us, from the written policies that govern workplaces to the unspoken norms that guide everyday behavior. They provide order and predictability, but they can also feel restrictive, leaving us to wonder how much freedom we really have within structured systems. Is freedom about escaping rules altogether, or about finding ways to live authentically within them? This session considers what it means to resist, comply, or quietly withdraw when faced with the forces that shape our lives.
Herman Melville, “Bartleby, the Scrivener”
Melville’s story introduces us to Bartleby, a law copyist whose quiet refusal—“I would prefer not to”—gradually unsettles the routines of his office and the expectations of his employer. Bartleby’s passive resistance exposes the limits of workplace structures and the discomfort that arises when someone withdraws from compliance.
Conversation Catalysts
At Premise, a Conversation Catalyst is a short story, essay, film, or poem that sparks reflection and connection. It’s the shared reference point that grounds each session and opens the door to meaningful and deep conversation.
Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street by Herman Melville
Text Set A
Preparation: < 1.5 hours
Session Description
Rules surround us, from the written policies that govern workplaces to the unspoken norms that guide everyday behavior. They provide order and predictability, but they can also feel restrictive, leaving us to wonder how much freedom we really have within structured systems. Is freedom about escaping rules altogether, or about finding ways to live authentically within them? This session considers what it means to resist, comply, or quietly withdraw when faced with the forces that shape our lives.
Herman Melville, “Bartleby, the Scrivener”
Melville’s story introduces us to Bartleby, a law copyist whose quiet refusal—“I would prefer not to”—gradually unsettles the routines of his office and the expectations of his employer. Bartleby’s passive resistance exposes the limits of workplace structures and the discomfort that arises when someone withdraws from compliance.
The story raises enduring questions about power, freedom, and the costs of rebellion. Is Bartleby exercising radical autonomy, or is his refusal another kind of trap? What does his resistance reveal about the nature of work, authority, and human dignity? How do we respond when someone rejects the rules that most people accept without question?
Text Set A
Preparation: < 1.5 hours
Session Description
Rules surround us, from the written policies that govern workplaces to the unspoken norms that guide everyday behavior. They provide order and predictability, but they can also feel restrictive, leaving us to wonder how much freedom we really have within structured systems. Is freedom about escaping rules altogether, or about finding ways to live authentically within them? This session considers what it means to resist, comply, or quietly withdraw when faced with the forces that shape our lives.
Herman Melville, “Bartleby, the Scrivener”
Melville’s story introduces us to Bartleby, a law copyist whose quiet refusal—“I would prefer not to”—gradually unsettles the routines of his office and the expectations of his employer. Bartleby’s passive resistance exposes the limits of workplace structures and the discomfort that arises when someone withdraws from compliance.
The story raises enduring questions about power, freedom, and the costs of rebellion. Is Bartleby exercising radical autonomy, or is his refusal another kind of trap? What does his resistance reveal about the nature of work, authority, and human dignity? How do we respond when someone rejects the rules that most people accept without question?
Conversation Catalysts
At Premise, a Conversation Catalyst is a short story, essay, film, or poem that sparks reflection and connection. It’s the shared reference point that grounds each session and opens the door to meaningful and deep conversation.
More conversation catalysts coming soon!
Text Set B
Preparation: < 1.5 hours
Session Description
At Premise, we’re always growing. Our sessions are shaped not only by the enduring questions we ask but also by the ideas and contributions of our participants and Chapter Leaders. We are a constructivist learning community, which means we build our learning experiences together.
More text sets for this question are on the way. Each one will follow our approach: short enough to prepare in under three hours, substantial and thought-provoking enough to spark deep discussion, and accessible to a wide audience.
In the meantime, we’d love to hear from you. If you have a suggestion for a story, essay, film, or poem that belongs here, please share it in the section below.
Text Set A
Preparation: < 1.5 hours
Session Description
Rules surround us, from the written policies that govern workplaces to the unspoken norms that guide everyday behavior. They provide order and predictability, but they can also feel restrictive, leaving us to wonder how much freedom we really have within structured systems. Is freedom about escaping rules altogether, or about finding ways to live authentically within them? This session considers what it means to resist, comply, or quietly withdraw when faced with the forces that shape our lives.
Herman Melville, “Bartleby, the Scrivener”
Melville’s story introduces us to Bartleby, a law copyist whose quiet refusal—“I would prefer not to”—gradually unsettles the routines of his office and the expectations of his employer. Bartleby’s passive resistance exposes the limits of workplace structures and the discomfort that arises when someone withdraws from compliance.
The story raises enduring questions about power, freedom, and the costs of rebellion. Is Bartleby exercising radical autonomy, or is his refusal another kind of trap? What does his resistance reveal about the nature of work, authority, and human dignity? How do we respond when someone rejects the rules that most people accept without question?